Jan 25, 2005

jurisprudential aesthetics

Lo and behold, no such phrase exists on Google--which might partially explain why I found Jonathan Turley's recent article, Art and the Constitution, so novel and intriguing. His thesis:
In many ways, the endeavors of law and art seem to have converged in the interpretation of the Constitution as the Court has moved from more classic to more impressionistic interpretations of constitutional provisions, particularly in the area of national security law.
Worth a look-see.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.