none dare call it conspiracy

Over on Panda's Thumb, John M. Lynch delves into the process of publishing in an ID journal, and finds it lacking. As Lynch notes:

Indeed, equally as noticable [sic] is that the papers published offer no new biological data or experiments. Frankly, even if the peer-reviewing process is stringent, no attempt is being made to provide and test explicit design hypotheses within the biological realm.

More on this in the future.